How We Help
Have you ever had an advocate?
At one time or another, we hope there has been an individual or group of individuals who has stood up for you and your well-being: a trusted friend, family member or someone else you could confide in. Now, you have found Searcy Denney, and our team of lawyers, paralegals, investigators and other professionals who can advocate on your behalf.
Let Us Be Your Voice
Have you have been the victim of someone else’s carelessness or negligence? Our firm’s 40 years of experience has been a powerful force, holding large corporations responsible for putting their profits over people. Our case results total over $5 billion on behalf of thousands of American families and workers from around the country.
On Your Side
If you’ve taken a dangerous drug, received a defective medical device or otherwise suffered a tragedy, then you need a team of experts on your side who not only have a successful record but who also have the previous experience in similar types of legal matters. That’s Searcy Denney. We help those whose rights have been violated, fight to hold drug and device manufacturers accountable for their actions and seek fairness and equality for anyone who has been injured by a defective product.
Do You Need Help Right Now?
When you call, you will speak with our receptionist, and you can simply say you are calling for a free consultation on your matter. The reception desk will immediately connect you with a member of our team to help answer your questions. In just a few moments, you will begin receiving reliable answers to the questions you have. Please keep in mind there is no cost to speak with a lawyer, and there is no obligation to hire us should you decide not to pursue a lawsuit.
What Are Mass Torts?
A Mass Tort is a case where many people are wrongfully harmed in a similar way, by a similar product. Often by a drug, medical device or defective product, a recent example is the Takata airbag recall, which affects millions of cars.
Stryker Hip Replacements: Our firm continues to hold leadership positions following the medical device recalls of Stryker’s Rejuvenate, ABGII and TMZF V40 modular hip systems.
Actos: Our firm has aggressively represented our clients against the maker of Actos, which was linked to causing bladder cancer.
A “tort” is a civil – rather than criminal – wrong committed by one person that results in injury to another. (In the legal context, a “person” can be a business or corporation.) Our civil justice system is founded upon principles of personal responsibility. As a result, a person who commits a tort is responsible for the harm caused and is liable for the physical and financial damages incurred by the victim.
As previously mentioned, mass tort cases allow many people harmed by the same person (or, in most instances, the same corporation) to benefit from shared research, efficiency and economy of scale, but still have their cases considered individually. The cases are pursued as individual lawsuits, often consolidated in the beginning by the Court. Mass tort cases are frequently confused with class actions, yet mass torts are far different than class actions. Class actions involve the claims of multiple parties, all brought in the same suit.
Some mass torts arise out of widespread disasters, such as the Exxon and BP oil spills, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the MGM Las Vegas hotel fire and various airlines crashes. Others are triggered by government action, such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recall of automobiles with design defects. Still, others come about as a result of violations by big businesses in antitrust claims, deceptive and fraudulent business practices and security fraud; or from scientific studies that discover previously undisclosed dangers of consumer products, such as pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
Unique Characteristics of Mass Tort Cases
- A large number of claims which derive from a single product or event: For example, many patients were injured by the same defective medical device, or numerous neighbors were sickened by the same toxic spill.
- All of the claims have factual and legal issues in common: The cases share identical or similar issues of law and fact associated with a single product, disaster, action or event.
- The claimants share a common goal: The aggregate value of all the claims rise and fall with the outcomes of the individual cases or other critical developments.
- Frequently, the cases are consolidated in the beginning: In an effort to promote judicial economy and promote consistency, one judge decides preliminary issues of law and discovery.
- Every claimant has his own, individual case: Unlike class actions, each claimant retains control over decisions regarding their case. If the case is tried by a jury, most of the time it is tried independently of the other mass tort cases.
By consolidating mass tort cases for preliminary pre-trial matters, and then trying the cases individually, our court system seeks to balance the interests of injured parties who have a right to have their claims individually addressed against the need for cost-efficient and timely proceedings. In doing so, lawyers and judges handling mass tort cases borrow some concepts from class action cases, while retaining each injured party’s individual case. Our Florida mass tort law firm outlines some important distinctions between class action claims and mass tort actions.
- In class actions, one representative lawsuit is filed by one or more plaintiffs on behalf of many other claimants who are in the same or similar situations.
- There is one trial on behalf of “the class,” and when a settlement or verdict is reached, all the members of the class share in the proceeds, often on an equal basis.
In order to obtain class certification, it is important to show that all of the class members have been harmed in the same fashion. This is why class action lawsuits generally are inappropriate for plaintiffs who have suffered personal injuries. Class actions are often used to recover financial losses under consumer fraud laws.
In mass tort litigation, individual cases are consolidated only for purposes of:
- Pre-trial procedures involving generic discovery and causation (document production and review, depositions of fact witnesses and development of expert witness reports and testimony)
- Case management briefing and consideration of various legal and evidentiary issues
- Weighing of sufficiency of expert witness testimony
- Resolution of disputes that arise during discovery
Each plaintiff’s case proceeds forward individually, and if the case is tried, it is tried individually. Any damages awarded in trial go to the individual, not to a class for later division.
Contact Us Today
- Alamo Rental Car
- Allstate Insurance, Co.
- Arthur Anderson
- Bridgestone/Firestone Tires, LLC
- Dow Corning Corporation
- Florida Department of Transportation
- Isuzu Motors Limited
- Phillip Morris
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, Co.
For a complete list of our victories, visit Cases Won Against Corporations.
Though we have defended the rights of Americans in a wide range of practice areas, with the same goal consistently in mind, we are committed to cases that specifically involve a personal injury and mass tort injuries (i.e. a personal injury case where many people are injured by the same product).
Furthermore, we take on cases that involve:
Have you used a drug that later caused you to be hospitalized? Chances are, you’re not alone.
Today, it’s common for devices to be fast-tracked through the 510(k) program, which brings new products to market without adequate testing.
Medical professionals often use pharmaceuticals to help individuals in pain. However, these synthetic drugs don’t always react well to the body and can cause life-threatening injuries.
If you or a loved one has been affected by one of the examples listed above, then call us today at (800) 388-3905. For your convenience, you can also use our contact form. In most circumstances, time constraints do apply. Therefore, it’s best to reach out as soon as possible. Remember, you are not alone. The lawyers and support staff at Searcy Denney are here to help you through this process. Only focus on your recovery, and let us do the rest.
Bellwether Trials and Mass Tort Litigation
Sometimes, a judge overseeing a mass tort project will conduct a bellwether trial. This process allows both the plaintiffs and defendants to experience a trial, and see who wins. This is thought to promote and expedite discussion of settlement for all the cases. Mass tort judges often are instrumental in mediating and settling mass torts cases after one or more bellwether trials take place.
In order to have a group of claims designated as mass tort litigation, mass tort attorneys representing the plaintiff(s) apply to federal or state court.
Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation
In the federal system, this process is initiated by filing a motion before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, a group of federal judges who meet every few months to consider such requests. Those judges have the power to order all individual cases filed in the federal system to be transferred and consolidated before one federal judge. Several states, such as California, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, have procedures similar to those used in federal multi-district litigation. The drug injury lawyers at our mass tort law firm know that Florida does not have formal rules for statewide management of mass tort cases. Historically, courts in this state have informally coordinated centralized management of complex cases, like the thousands of breast implant, diet drug and tobacco cases that have been litigated in the state over the past two decades.
The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, as well as state courts that are considering whether mass tort treatment is appropriate, must consider a number of different issues:
- Are there are a large number of claims associated with a single product or issue?
- Is there a high degree of commonality among the issues and actors?
- Is there substantial value interdependence among the individual cases?
- Is there geographical disparity among the parties?
- Is there a high level of commonality of injuries and/or damages among plaintiffs?
- Is this jurisdiction fair and convenient to plaintiffs, witnesses and attorneys?
- Would coordinated discovery and management be advantageous?
- Does centralization result in effective utilization of judicial resources, facilities and personnel?
- Are there related issues pending in federal or other state courts that require coordination by a single judge?
- Is there a chance that centralization could unreasonably delay progress, increase expenses or prejudice the outcome?
Once a mass tort designation has been established and a judge has been selected, the judge typically holds a hearing to establish a schedule for certain issues, such as pretrial procedures, discovery issues, forms, calendaring and other details. All mass tort cases involve complex and substantial discovery. Discovery is the process of obtaining relevant documents, data and testimony from the defendants and others. Once individual trials begin, attorneys for all of the plaintiffs draw upon this collective body of information to establish the evidence and testimony necessary to win the case.
Our Florida mass tort law firm has a proven track record of substantial recoveries in mass tort litigation. Currently, we represent thousands of victims who are pursuing a mass tort lawsuit against some of the most powerful industries around the world. Most of these lawsuits involve a defective and dangerous drug, consumer product or medical device.
We Want to Help
For our assistance, call us today at (800) 388-3905, or feel free to use our convenient contact form. Because of time constraints, it’s better to reach out as soon as possible. At Searcy Denney, we want to help you — you don’t have to do it alone.